Summary and Results of the 2008-2009 Material Handling Student Design Competition
Sponsored by the College Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE) and Keogh Consulting
Each year, the Material Handling Student Design Competition provides student teams with the opportunity to design a manufacturing or distribution facility to support the objectives of a fictional company (case content is drawn from real-world implementations). Actual company names are changed along with some aspects of the data to provide the appropriate challenge to the student teams as well as protecting the identity of the actual company and their products. The 2008-2009 case was developed by Keogh Consulting.
Contest Case Summary Description
This year’s case study focuses on a facility design project assigned to Dollar Value Supplies’ (DV$) engineering team, a major wholesale Third Party Logistics (3PL) company. DV$ is challenged with the goal to design a distribution center to service new business by utilizing an existing facility that is ready for final fit-out by the builder / developer. The information contained in this case study has been developed to provide a real world situation in regard to designing a functional and efficient distribution center layout and understanding the 3PL business.
The 3PL industry has been growing significantly for the last decade, thanks to the trend in outsourcing. In today’s market, companies must redefine their strengths and focus only on core competencies. Even 3PL companies need to specialize in a certain area of logistics. For example in this case study, DV$ focuses on wholesale business by supplying various goods for major retailers, ranging from general merchandise, health and beauty supplies, dairy, meat, produce and frozen products.
Judging
The three academic and three industry judges evaluated the entries according to the criteria of product flow, equipment utilization, space utilization, operational plan, overall integration and economic justification. Additionally, the judges were asked to evaluate writing quality, analysis and presentation.
CICMHE is pleased to announce the following results:
First Place: ($1500 split among the team plus $500 for the department):
Syed Hasnain, Akiko Nakata, Cory Smith and Jamie Smith
Virginia Tech
Yasemin Merzifonluoglu, Advisor
Second Place: ($1000 split among the teams plus $500 for each department):
Natasha Jain, Matthew Knepper and Chanpeng Shen
Georgia Institute of Technology
Chen Zhou, Advisor
Third Place: ($500 split among the teams plus $500 for each department):
José Gabriel Rodríguez, Rodrigo Velarde Gonzalez, Huseyin Zorba and Desirae Gilbert
Rochester Institute of Technology
Andres Carrano, Advisor
Honorable Mentions:
Nick Burton, David Meschkat, Roger Paredes and Samrat Singh
Texas A&M University
Andrew Johnson, Advisor